My Blog

New Market Drivers Put a Positive Tone on all of the Negative
September 24th, 2007 8:55 AM

Through the first half of calendar 2007, builder revenues are down, home deliveries are off and pretax profits are well below year earlier levels. According to Fitch's new forecast for the balance of 2007, it appears likely that builders' financial pressures will continue unabated with full year revenues dropping 30 to 35 percent, on average, while pretax profits, before real estate charges, could plummet 75 to 80 percent. Yet, not unlike life, there are positive opportunities in the negative if we are looking and keeping our eyes opened for them.

"Although real estate continues to struggle, developers, civil engineers and architects can remain healthy by working creatively to stay on top of new market drivers," said Keith Mayer, president and CEO, Giffels-Webster Engineers, a civil engineering firm with a 50-year industry reputation for its vision for today's market and beyond. "Our team at Giffels-Webster has identified the trends that prove opportunities thrive beyond single-family homes in the suburbs."

According to Mayer, the top five hottest market growth areas are:

  • Green building and design
  • Assisted living centers
  • Hospital expansions, education campus additions
  • Mixed-use developments
  • Urban revitalization.

With increased pressure on communities and businesses to promote environmentally sound designs, developers increasingly are incorporating green elements into their projects. A plan to develop a parcel of land for retail, Mayer says, might include green roofs, rain gardens, or gutter water retention and irrigation systems. "LEED-certified environmental experts soon will become 'must-have' team members as demand for energy efficient, healthy spaces grow stronger."

Assisted living developments are on the rise due to higher life expectancies and the influx of aging baby boomers. By helping seniors lead independent lives in non-institutionalized environments, these projects are designed to incorporate nature trails, community dining, exercise facilities, music rooms, libraries, salons, and game rooms. Opportunities exist to work with both private developers and public government-funded projects.

"While residential is at a peak right now many investors in the Valley are realizing significant cash flow by either directly investing in assisted living facilities or converting existing homes into these potential cash cows," added J. Dan Essa, agent with Team Vision in Scottsdale. "It's a matter of spotting trends and finding opportunities that pencil out for investors and these property types are on fire right now."

Fueled by institutional projects being funded privately though corporate gifts and individual endowments, the third growth market identified by Giffels-Webster Engineers are Hospital Expansions and Education Campus additions. "These 'recession- proof' resources mean even during economic downturns, the market segment moves forward with plentiful building and capital improvement projects," explains Mayer.

With the subprime fiasco still fresh in the minds of the lending community, securing financing for projects can be more difficult. Mayer suggests that builders consider mixed-use developments because they reduce risk. "With this approach, the developer's investment is spread across the spectrum so it remains viable even if one segment does not perform as expected."

"Mixed use is a combination retail and residential with large, national retailers combined with smaller, boutique-type stores, as well as housing varying by size, budget and amenities," added Essa. "There is a project in Gilbert right now dubbed 'the heartbeat," that the entire community is excited about. In fact, this project will provide density as developers will be allowed to go six stories high."

Lastly, municipalities, who are proactively transforming their space to appeal to potential and current residents, will need developer support to make it happen. Municipalities and townships in their efforts to make downtowns, retail hubs and central business districts more inviting and accessible are considering projects such as streetscape improvements, including attractive landscaping, decorative streetlights, brick sidewalk pavers, and strategically planned parking areas, all ways o help improve a bottom line.

While the news today focuses on the negative, there are always two sides to a market. Opportunities, or new market divers, exist if builders keep an eye on what prospective clients -- and possible new ones -- are in need of.


Posted by Nancy K. Parente on September 24th, 2007 8:55 AMPost a Comment (0)

Countrywide Caught in Mortgage Spiral
September 15th, 2007 7:47 AM

Countrywide Caught in Mortgage Spiral


Saturday September 15, 5:42 AM EDT

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Countrywide Financial Corp. grew from a two-man startup in 1969 to become the nation's leading mortgage lender by deftly riding out housing boom-and-bust cycles. This time around, however, the ride has been a lot rougher, leaving the company in a scramble to regain its footing as the housing market has turned from boom to bust.

To survive, it's been forced to borrow billions of dollars, announce thousands of job cuts and dramatically restructure its lending practices to nearly eliminate risky subprime loans to borrowers with shaky credit that have led to massive foreclosures and defaults wracking the housing market.

"In an absolute level sense, this is the biggest challenge" Countrywide has ever faced, said Frederick Cannon, an analyst with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc.

Several analysts believe Countrywide will survive the crisis, based on the strength of its retail banking operation, track record in the industry and operating changes made in recent weeks.

But they said it could see deeper cutbacks and lose ground to competitors while weathering a housing crisis expected to last at least 18 more months.

"At the end of the day, in this environment, Countrywide is not in as strong a position as its biggest competitor, Wells Fargo," Cannon said.

Stan Ross, chairman of the Lusk Center for Real Estate at the University of Southern California, said Countrywide will face intense competition as big and small lenders move to focus on prime loans, a sector once dominated by Countrywide.

"It's going to take time, and I think their cutbacks are going to be greater than perhaps we anticipate," Ross said.

Countrywide dominated the industry when interest rates began to plummet at the start of the decade and competitors rushed to make subprime loans.

The company didn't lead the charge to make those loans, "but as an industry leader, they were right there," said Robert Napoli, an analyst with Piper Jaffray.

"They have an effect on the market. They have to, being the biggest," he said.

The Calabasas, Calif.-based company's loan production last year totaled $468 billion and it accounted for more than 13 percent of the loan servicing market as of June 30, according to the mortgage industry publication Inside Mortgage Finance.

Countrywide and the rest of the mortgage industry also got caught up in the frenzy to make nontraditional loans then resell the mortgages for hefty profits to Wall Street banks.

Fortunes dove when demand for those loan packages plummeted amid rising defaults. The resulting credit crunch that tore through the markets has left Countrywide and others holding loans they couldn't sell and hurting for cash to keep funding new ones.

"The market changed very quickly on them ... they just underestimated how rapidly the market changed," Napoli added.

A report in The New York Times cited unnamed former Countrywide employees saying the company used financial incentives to encourage employees to steer borrowers into subprime loans to boost profits.

The allegations prompted North Carolina Treasurer Richard Moore to send a letter dated Tuesday to Countrywide asking for an explanation. Moore is the trustee of a pension fund that holds more than $11 million in Countrywide shares.

"Countrywide has sacrificed long-term sustainability for short-term profits," Moore wrote. "As an investor, I expect assurances that these practices have ceased and that the company is returning to a business model that both respects consumers and protects shareholder value."

Countrywide has strongly refuted the report, noting its business processes are designed to prohibit pushing customers who qualify for prime loans into subprime loans, and that its loan officers do not receive higher commissions for selling subprime loans.

During a conference call with Wall Street analysts in January, Countrywide Chairman and Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo said the company expected rising delinquencies and a weak housing market but was "well positioned and extremely optimistic about our prospects to continue generating growth and superior returns over future cycles."

Since then, Countrywide stock has dropped about 60 percent and is now trading around $19 a share.

In a recent letter to employees announcing as many as 12,000 layoffs, he characterized the current housing market cycle as "the most severe in the contemporary history of our industry."

Countrywide didn't return calls seeking an interview with Mozilo.

The son of a butcher, he has guided Countrywide through a number of housing cycles.

He co-founded the company nearly four decades ago with fellow New Yorker David Loeb, taking the fledgling company public only six months after it launched.

Trading at less than $1 a share, the startup failed to generate much investment capital, so Mozilo and Loeb headed West in the fall of 1969 and set up shop in suburban Los Angeles, a housing hotbed.

Its rise was part of a broader trend in which banks and traditional savings and loans lost market share as borrowers turned to more market-savvy mortgage firms offering a wider variety of loan programs.

Countrywide's expansion was also fueled by its move to sell conventional mortgage loans that were then resold to government-sponsored mortgage companies the Federal National Mortgage Association, also known as Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp, or Freddie Mac.

The strategy helped Countrywide weather the crash of the high-flying housing market at the end of the 1980s. In 1990 the company reported its loan production totaled more than $3 billion.

The interest rate upheaval during the 1990s had a mixed impact on the company. Low rates at the start of the decade helped boost business amid a surge in refinancing.

But when rates eventually kicked back up, the company and other mortgage lenders saw loan production fall off.

Countrywide coped with that downturn by diversifying into more financial services, eventually opening its retail bank.

When interest rates began to plunge at the start of this decade, Countrywide joined the rest of the industry in rushing to feed an unprecedented demand on Wall Street for home loans.

Last fall, Wall Street investors began to sour on mortgage loans, particularly subprime loans.

While Countrywide was less exposed to subprime loans than the rest of the market, it had stepped up high-yield loan products such as pay option loans, which give borrowers the option to make a lower payment but can result in the unpaid portion being added to the principal balance.

In recent weeks, the company has drawn down on an $11.5 billion line of credit and raised $2 billion by selling a stake to Bank of America.

This week, it boosted its borrowing capacity by another $12 billion through new or existing credit agreements.

To further help reassure investors of the company's stability, management has implemented layoffs and shifted its loan production through its banking arm.

It's also closed the door to all subprime loans except for those it can sell back to U.S. government-backed lenders.

"Countrywide is quickly adjusting to market conditions and ... now has the breathing room to do so," said Bart Narter, senior analyst at Celent, a Boston-based financial research and consulting firm. "One sees glimmers of hope."


Posted by Nancy K. Parente on September 15th, 2007 7:47 AMPost a Comment (0)

Are National Home Prices Down or Up?
September 10th, 2007 7:49 AM

You may have noticed something curious during the final week of August: Standard & Poor's widely-watched Case-Shiller house price index came out with the alarming news that American homes lost 3.2 percent of their market value between mid 2006 and mid 2007. In some areas, such as Detroit (down 11 percent), Tampa (-7.7 percent), Washington D.C. (-7.0 percent) and Phoenix (-6.6 percent), the devaluation was much more dramatic. In 15 of the top 20 bellwether metropolitan markets, said S&P, home values dropped during the year.

The report helped trigger a sell-off on Wall Street, hit the front pages and TV newscasts across the country, and became the latest fodder for housing bust aficionados.

Just two days later, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), released its quarterly survey on the same subject. But its numbers were nearly mirror-image opposites: Year to year second quarter house prices were up by 3.2 percent on average nationally, buoyed in part by strong performances in the Pacific Northwest states, some of the Mountain states, Utah, Texas, Wyoming, and parts of North Carolina, among others. The agency found prices up on average in 226 out of the 287 largest markets.

The OFHEO report, made public the day before the start of the Labor Day holiday, attracted almost no media attention, and generally was backburnered in the publications that mentioned it at all. Though both surveys use a similar "repeat-sales" transaction methodology, the bad news got all the press, and the good news alternative got buried. Most American real estate owners were none the wiser.

Putting aside the media's appetite for the negative and the pre-holiday release of the OFHEO study, how could large, respected national survey organizations arrive at such contradictory conclusions? The answer is buried away in the empirical data sources used by each organization.

The Case-Shiller survey was created to provide market-by-market benchmarks for a new breed of real estate financial instrument: Futures contracts tied to housing price movements, allowing investors to hedge their bets elsewhere on the direction of real estate values in key areas around the country.

The OFHEO House Price Index was created with a totally different objective: To allow the agency, which has regulatory oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to keep track of the value of the collateral backing the two congressionally-chartered corporations' mortgage loan and securities portfolios. OFHEO's data pool is rich -- vast numbers of new loans and refinancings on houses financed by Fannie or Freddie. The data covers every state, drills down to the smallest and most rural of metropolitan markets, and comes with access to appraisals and other loan file details.

However, because it solely consists of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-financed properties, the OFHEO database is limited to houses with conforming, conventional loans no greater than $417,000, the current limit for both companies. The data omits FHA/VA loans, jumbo mortgages, most subprime and Alt-A nonconforming loans, and condominiums. It does include refinancings, which OFHEO freely admits tend to come with higher valuations than they would be if the house were sold outright.

The Case-Shiller index, on the other hand, covers houses with mortgages of every type and size, recorded at hundreds of courthouses around the country and scooped up by data aggregators working on contract. It includes no refinancings. More significantly, it has no data whatsoever from 13 states -- including several that OFHEO ranks among the current strongest price gainers -- and has incomplete data from 29 states for a variety of technical and legal reasons. Case-Shiller also weights properties by their values -- so a $250,000 house gets half the statistical weight of a $500,000 house.

These inherent differences, which are virtually never spelled out as potential limitations in press reports, have created indexes that are essentially measuring different pools of houses and price changes. The Case-Shiller index is more heavily weighted toward higher-price markets, such as California, parts of Florida and the Northeast. OFHEO undersamples upper-bracket luxury houses in the same areas, but covers a far wider geographic spectrum than Case-Shiller.

As a result, when high-cost areas on the two coasts saw their appreciation rates take off during the early boom years, Case-Shiller was out in front capturing the big spike upward in those states. Similarly it appears to be out in front on the way down for those states and metro areas, but its national index may be missing some of the positive appreciation apparently underway in states where its data is thin.

You don't have to answer the question, "Which index should I follow?" The fact is, neither index is perfect, neither index is capturing everything going on in home real estate. Follow them both. But don't ignore their built-in limitations, and roll with the newscasts and headlines accordingly.


Posted by Nancy K. Parente on September 10th, 2007 7:49 AMPost a Comment (0)

Home Insurance
September 4th, 2007 8:46 AM

The kids are back in school and now it's time for you to do your home work.

If you have not updated your home inventory and estimated value of your possessions for more than 12 months, you may be in trouble if faced with a "final exam" -- an insurance claim.

Simply paying property insurance premiums on time is not enough. To ensure your possessions, shelter, financial well-being and your home-based business, if you have one, are safe and secure, you should actually read your insurance policy or go over the details with your insurer's representative.

The contract between you and the insurer -- your policy -- must accurately estimate full value and must include relevant details of what you own, which usages are involved and what replacement would cost. If you carry too little insurance or if changes in use would disqualify some or all of a claim, that's your problem because the insurance industry considers it your responsibility to arrange correct coverage for your property and lifestyle.

From a consumer perspective, "The Best" insurance brokers and agents may be those who contact clients annually to ensure coverage reflects property value increases, renovations, new acquisitions and extended usage like a start-up home-based business, a new equipment-intense hobby or the inclusion of foster children.

If you are on your own with this annual up-date, tie the inventory review to a seasonal shift associated with "buying sprees" like back to school or Christmas. Include taxes in your listing. Minimum contents coverage is usually calculated as a percentage of building value. If the value of your possessions exceeds the insurer's calculated percent, then additional coverage may be required to protect the new home theatre, latest diamond ring or "had-to-have" golf clubs.

To up date the building's replacement value, contact your insurance representative. "Insured value" does not include land value, often a considerable portion of market value.

The Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), the national trade association of the private property and casualty insurance industry representing more than 90 percent of non-government home, car and business insurance, provides consumers with details on their responsibilities and rights. Armed with accurate information on what to expect, you are well prepared to ask the right questions whether you are searching for a new insurer or renewing a policy. Not convinced there's value in learning more? Did you know ... ?

  • Decide on Agent vs Broker: "Agents" work for one insurer and can only offer that insurer's policy types and features to consumers. You must fit this insurer's criteria for "insurable" or find your own alternative supplier. "Brokers" each represent a small range of insurance companies, ideally chosen to provide the most useful range of products and options for the client base served by that broker. When shopping around, ask each broker which criteria they use in selecting companies and how their business is distributed between the insurers. If one insurance company drops you, the broker will attempt to switch you to another insurer.

  • Compare beyond price: IBC Consumer Information Officer Don Stewart provides an example: "Coverage matters. All policies are not the same as companies can enhance their policies or not enhance them. For example, all companies will insure to estimated replacement cost. Most will add 'sleep at night' enhancement—guaranteed replacement cost." Steward goes on to explain that some insurers will pay all the replacement cost even if it exceeds the insured level while others will cap over-payment to a percentage, perhaps 20 percent.

  • Read the fine print: "People should always read their policy so they know what they are covered for because it's better to know before than after," said Stewart. For instance, policies do cover wind damage—something blowing off or onto your house—but a tree falling on a home can add complications beyond the damage. The policy may include payment to have your tree taken off the building, but not off the property. If the tree belonged to a neighbour, your insurance covers the damage to your home. If the tree was known to be in dangerous condition and the neighbour did nothing about this, your insurance company may go after the neighbour's. Let the insurers fight this out rather than taking on the tree owner yourself since any resulting settlement from your neighbour will be based on depreciated value whereas your insurer will pay you replacement value.

  • Hidden Secrets May Cost You: Owners of older homes may have knob-and-tube or aluminum wiring within the walls without knowing it. If the house burned down and one of these deficiencies was discovered later, the policy would still stand. However, if your insurer inspects your property at any point and finds a "red flag" like an oil tank or knob-and-tube wiring, you could be given notice to modernize or face having your policy cancelled. Switching insurers could trigger a similar situation. Once you sign up, an insurance inspector may discover a condition the insurer will not cover and you'll have to fix the situation, or find an insurer who will overlook it.

  • It's For The Unaffordable, Not Home Maintenance: IBC explains that home insurance is there to protect you from having to pay out a huge amount at once, often at the very worst time emotionally. "Auto insurance is claims rated and it is affected by claims," said Stewart, comparing insurers' reactions to a claim. "In home insurance, you would lose the discount for being without a claim. Where you run into a problem with home insurance is two or three claims in two or three years. When you have a claim and it goes on record, the amount does not matter. Frequency does....Home insurance is not a maintenance contract...legally you can claim all kinds of things, but insurers don't like this so they will drop you, and others will not want you."

Insurance is an integral part of the price of real estate ownership. If property insurance lapses, existing mortgages are in default and may become due and payable. New financing may not be possible. The accompanying loss of millions in personal liability coverage places you at risk from law suits. Consider insurance premiums, insurer-driven renovations and continuing property modernization as basic ownership costs.

"Welfare is society's problem, not insurance," said Stewart. "They are there to try and make a profit. If you can't afford to keep a house, you'd better sell it ... . A lot of insurance companies do charity on the side, but not in business. GM does not reduce the price because you cannot afford it."


Posted by Nancy K. Parente on September 4th, 2007 8:46 AMPost a Comment (0)

Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Nancy K Parente
Phone: Cell: Fax:

My Blog

Copyright © 2008 Nancy K Parente
Portions Copyright © 2008 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map


  Find a Real Estate Professional